<html><body><div dir="auto" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">And imagine a decision that decided just one or a few, but not all, provisions in a CC&R document were not enforceable, particularly if it was just silent on the remaining issues. </div><div dir="auto" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br></div><div dir="auto" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">Makes Underwriting a comprehensive endorsement an adventure. </div><div dir="auto" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br></div><div dir="auto" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">Are there no similar cases in Washington?</div><div id="ms-outlook-mobile-body-separator-line" dir="auto"><br></div><div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" dir="auto"><div dir="auto">George</div><div dir="auto">Sent from my mobile phone 206-437-5869</div></div><div dir="auto" id="mail-editor-reference-message-container" class=""><br><hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%"><div id="divRplyFwdMsg" style="font-size: 11pt;"><strong>From:</strong> Judiciarycommittee1 <judiciarycommittee1-bounces@washingtonlandtitle.com> on behalf of Erin Stines <erin.stines@wltic.com><br><strong>Sent:</strong> Monday, May 5, 2025 4:30:37 PM<br><strong>To:</strong> judiciarycommittee1-bounces@washingtonlandtitle.com <judiciarycommittee1-bounces@washingtonlandtitle.com>; 1 WLTA Judiciary Committee (ListServ) <judiciarycommittee1@washingtonlandtitle.com><br><strong>Subject:</strong> [Judiciarycommittee1] FW: Enforcing covenants: "Use it or lose it"<br></div><br>
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">I haven’t seen a case that has caught my eye in a while but this is of interest to me! HOA was lax on enforcing its covenants and loses the right to enforce the covenants – declared null
and void! Yikes. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><b><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#006DB7; mso-ligatures:none">Erin M. Stines | Underwriting Counsel – Pacific Northwest</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-bottom:2.0pt; line-height:10.0pt; mso-line-height-rule:exactly">
<span lang="ES" style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#7B8184; mso-ligatures:none">P: 253.264.7819</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-bottom:2.0pt; line-height:10.0pt; mso-line-height-rule:exactly">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ligatures:none"><a href="https://wltic.com/" style="color: rgb(70, 120, 134); text-decoration: underline;"><span lang="ES" style="font-size:12.0pt; color:#0563C1">wltic.com</span></a></span><span lang="ES" style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#7B8184; mso-ligatures:none"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#006DB7; mso-ligatures:none"> </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#006DB7; mso-ligatures:none"><img border="0" width="315" height="27" id="image001.png@01DBBDD6.E6CA24E0" src="cid:image001.png@01DBBDD6.E6CA24E0" alt="signature_2134849999" style="width: 3.2847in; height: 0.2847in; max-width: 100%;"></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:black; mso-ligatures:none"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size:6.5pt; font-family:"Helvetica Neue"; color:#7B8185; mso-ligatures:none">This e-mail and its attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity who is the intended recipient and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure or any type of use under applicable law. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee, agent or representative responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply immediately to the sender.</span><span style="font-size:6.5pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#7B8185; mso-ligatures:none"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ligatures:none"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ligatures:none"> </span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ligatures:none">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ligatures:none"> DIRT - Real Estate Lawyers Listserv <DIRT@LISTSERV.UMKC.EDU>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Whitman, Dale<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, May 4, 2025 9:49 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> DIRT@LISTSERV.UMKC.EDU<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [DIRT] Enforcing covenants: "Use it or lose it"</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;">HOA's are often quite lax in enforcing covenants against their own members. What they may not realize is that failure to enforce covenants consistently may result in a situation in which the covenants become unenforceable. A court may decide
that the widespread failure to enforce the covenants amounts to a waiver of the covenants or acquiescence in the violations. Here's the case, as summarized by the CAI Law Reporter, that illustrates the point. It's a good idea to remind your HOA clients that
if they expect to continue to enforce their covenants they need to be consistent about it. – Dale</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in"><b>Covenants Enforcement: The Supreme Court of South Dakota held that where there have been widespread violations of restrictive covenants that have gone unenforced, they may be deemed void and unenforceable.</b><b><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span> </b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in"><b> </b></p>
<ul type="disc" style="margin-bottom: 0in;margin-top:0in">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3"><b>Hood v. Straatmeyer, No. 30180 (S.D. Mar. 5, 2025)</b><b><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span></b></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3"><b> </b></li></ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in">Shadowland Ranch (subdivision) is a subdivision in Meade County, S.D. Clyde and Nancy Straatmeyer (the Straatmeyers) purchased a lot in the subdivision.<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in">The subdivision was subject to a set of restrictive covenants (covenants) recorded in 1976. In part, these covenants prohibited further subdivision of the lots and required that there be only one single-family dwelling
per lot with no larger than a three-car garage.<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in">In 2020, the owner of Lot 6 successfully applied to the city to subdivide Lot 6 into Lot 6A and 6B. Thereafter, the Straatmeyers purchased Lot 6B. They immediately hired a contractor who began the process of digging
and pouring the foundation for a home with an attached three-car garage. After seeing the construction begin, the Straatmeyers' neighbors sent them a letter stating their project violated the covenants.<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in">Eighteen of those neighbors (the neighbors) filed suit against the Straatmeyers. They sought a determination from the court stating the covenants were valid and the lot subdivision and construction were violations
of the covenants. The suit also sought a court order directing the Straatmeyers to remove the construction from their lot. The Straatmeyers responded asserting several defenses and added a counterclaim that the neighbors had for years allowed several activities
constituting violations of the covenants. The Straatmeyers requested the trial court rule the covenants null and void since selective enforcement of the covenants would be inequitable. The Straatmeyers asked the trial court to order the neighbors to bring
their properties into compliance with the covenants. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in">The trial court found several lot owners violated several of the covenants' restrictions including having larger than three-car garages and building structures within a certain distance of the lot boundaries. The
trial court ultimately concluded it would be inequitable and unjust to allow homeowners within a subdivision to selectively enforce the covenants against some property owners while turning a blind eye to violations by other homeowners particularly since the
covenants were never previously enforced despite numerous violations. The trial court declared the covenants were null and void. Accordingly, the trial court ruled the Straatmeyers were not in violation of the covenants since the covenants were not enforceable.
The neighbors appealed.<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in">On appeal, the neighbors contested the trial court's findings that there were other covenants violations. The appeals court agreed with the trial court finding the trial court had not clearly erred in finding multiple
ongoing violations of the covenants by the neighbors. Therefore, the appeals court did not reverse the determinations of the trial court. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in">The neighbors then argued the trial court abused its equitable discretion when it declared the covenants to be null and void. The right to enforce a restrictive covenant may be lost by waiver or acquiescence of
the violation of that covenant. To support such a defense, there must be a showing of a clear, unequivocal and decisive act or acts showing an intention to relinquish the existing right. The appeals court looked to the multiple covenants violations by the
neighbors, and to the fact that there was no record that anyone attempted to enforce the covenants since they were recorded in 1976 (prior to the filing of this case). <br>
<br>
Based on that review, the appeals court found the trial court had not erred in finding the inactions of the neighbors and failure to enforce the covenants in the past were enough to constitute an acquiescence to the violation of the covenants and therefore
a forfeiture of the right to enforce said covenants. It further ruled it was within the equitable power of a trial court to declare a covenant void upon showing that enforcement of the covenant would be inequitable considering widespread, unchallenged violations
that undermine the purpose of the covenant.<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in">Accordingly, the appeals court affirmed the trial court's determinations.<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;margin-left:.5in"><i>©2025 Community Associations Institute. All rights reserved. Reproduction and redistribution in any form is strictly prohibited.</i><i><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span> Reprinted with permission.</i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-ligatures:none"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Arial Narrow",sans-serif">To add or remove from this mailing list, please go to <<a href="http://listserv.umkc.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=DIRT&A=1" title="http://listserv.umkc.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=DIRT&A=1" style="color: rgb(70, 120, 134); text-decoration: underline;">http://listserv.umkc.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=DIRT&A=1</a>>
or send an email message to the address <a href="mailto:listserv@listserv.umkc.edu" title="mailto:listserv@listserv.umkc.edu" style="color: rgb(70, 120, 134); text-decoration: underline;">
listserv@listserv.umkc.edu</a>, with the text SIGNOFF DIRT in the body of the message.
</span></p>
<p style="margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Arial Narrow",sans-serif">You are subscribed to the DIRT list as
<a href="mailto:erin.stines@WLTIC.COM" style="color: rgb(70, 120, 134); text-decoration: underline;">erin.stines@WLTIC.COM</a>. <br>
Problems or questions should be directed to <a href="mailto:techsupportcenter@umkc.edu" title="mailto:techsupportcenter@umkc.edu" style="color: rgb(70, 120, 134); text-decoration: underline;">
techsupportcenter@umkc.edu</a>. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Aptos;margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-ligatures:none">----------------- DIRT provides an informal forum for the expression and discussion of ideas, theories, and concepts about legal issues relating to real estate. Creativity,
speculation and rumination are encouraged. The comments published here should not be taken to represent the commentor's position or opinion in any present or future client representation or litigation; they should be regarded as tentative thoughts, based on
particular facts as the commentor understood them, and subject to later rethinking and revision. They are not legal advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They are not electronic records, electronic signatures, or agreements to conduct any
transaction by electronic means pursuant to UETA, ESign, or any similar law.</span></p>
</div>
<br></div></body></html>